geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject RE: Geronimo Schema Versioning
Date Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:43:57 GMT
I think that that is too complex.  What scenario do people envision
where having a schema version attribute is a compelling feature?  If
there is none, or we struggle to make one up, then we don't need to
figure out how to "fit" this feature in.


Regards,
Alan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sandip Ghayal [mailto:sghayal@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 8:42 AM
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Geronimo Schema Versioning
> 
> Or we can have 3 version numbers where the tag
> 
> version=
> 
> specified Geronimo Version number which will be
> incremented afer every version release.
> 
> So if some one is looking at differences between two
> version of geronimo, he will be able to point out
> easily that geronimo verions 2.0 used naming version
> 1_1 and jetty version 1_0
> 
> where as geronimo version 1.0 used naming version 1_0
> and jetty version 1_0
> 
> This should also satisfy Alan's query.
> 
> What do you guys think ?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Sandip
> --- Aaron Mulder <ammulder@alumni.princeton.edu>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> > > I think I have a scenario were your proposal about
> > the schema version
> > > attribute will not hold up.  Let's say that we've
> > added some wizbang
> > > feature to
> > http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/naming_1_1.  Now,
> > I want to
> > > deploy this new feature in my web app:
> > >
> > > <web-app
> > >
> >
> xmlns="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/web/jetty_1_0"
> > >
> >
> xmlns:naming="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/naming_1_1"
> > >     configId="..."  parentId="..."
> > >     version="1.?">
> >
> > 	I don't think I like the "version=X" attribute.  I
> > think having a
> > version number in the schema is good enough.  If
> > you're deploying a web
> > app 2.4 schema with a Geronimo Jetty 1.0 deployment
> > descriptor, I think we
> > have all the information we need, and in the example
> > above, having
> > *three* version numbers in the header certainly
> > doesn't make things any
> > clearer (or further narrow down exactly which schema
> > files we're
> > targeting).
> >
> > Aaron
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail



Mime
View raw message