geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruce Snyder <fer...@frii.com>
Subject Re: Please Vote: 1 deployment tool or 2?
Date Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:56:05 GMT
Aaron Mulder wrote:

 >  [X ] Add these features to the existing bin/deployer.jar tool
 >  [  ] Create a new bin/xyz.jar tool with only these features, so we
 >       have an "offline" deployer and a "JSR-88" or "J2EE" deployer.


Hiram Chirino wrote:

> To simplify all the modes of operation I would recommend we follow the 
> command structure that tools like "cvs" and "svn" use.  So you would 
> like something like:
> 
> admin.jar [general options] deploy [list of valid deploy command options]
> admin.jar [general options] undeploy [list of valid undeploy options]
> admin.jar [general options] start [list of valid start options]
> admin.jar [general options] start [list of valid stop options]
> admin.jar [general options] list modules [list of valid list options]
> admin.jar [general options] list targets [list of valid list options]
> admin.jar --help

I really like Hiram's idea above. IMO, our goal is to make things 
easier, not more complex. I think that a single tool will be easier to 
understand than two. Additionally, a simplified command set within the 
single tool will further ease the deployment process.

Bruce
-- 
perl -e 'print 
unpack("u30","<0G)U8V4\\@4VYY9&5R\\"F9E<G)E=\\$\\!F<FEI+F-O;0\\`\\`");'

The Castor Project
http://www.castor.org/

Apache Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/

Mime
View raw message