Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <414CB62C.2030309@apache.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 00:26:52 +0200
From: Jacek Laskowski <jlaskowski@apache.org>
Organization: Apache Geronimo (http://geronimo.apache.org)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040817
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Problem building from subversion
References: <414AA3AD.3000204@gmx.de> <414B6816.2060809@apache.org>
 <414B91F3.9000302@optusnet.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <414B91F3.9000302@optusnet.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Gianny Damour wrote:

> This problem is fixed. It was due to the fact that the geronimo-tomcat 
> artifact was not copied to the geronimo repository prior to deploy 
> TomcatGBean.

Thanks Gianny!

> BTW, I have noticed a couple of "issues":
> * there is an indirect dependency between Catalina (the class) and the 
> javax.management package. I have discovered this problem when mounting 
> the geronimo-tomcat module within Eclipse. So we will need to declare a 
> new dependency; and

I've noticed it too, but don't see a need to declare anything yet 
(perhaps, because of the build order, it's still lurking and waiting to 
show up).

> * to some extent we are lucky to have a build of geronimo-tomcat after 
> assembly. Indeed, geronimo-tomcat assumes that the assembly module has 
> been built, yet it does not declare a dependency to force a correct 
> build order. I think that geronimo-tomcat should be installed like the 
> other modules (e.g. geronimo-jetty).

Yes, that's totally true. There're a lot of work to do and I hope the 
things you've raised will encourage someone to jump in and help with the 
stuff. That's a fabulous time to contribute for anyone who keeps asking 
yourself what to work on.

> Gianny

Jacek