Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90835 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2004 17:17:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2004 17:17:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 91235 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2004 17:17:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 91095 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2004 17:17:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 90851 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2004 17:17:13 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of bradley.beck@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.170.198] (HELO mproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:17:11 -0700 Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 78so244364rnk for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:16:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.96.16 with SMTP id t16mr717858rnb; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:16:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.96.15 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:16:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3937375d0409151016604c1cdd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:16:47 -0500 From: Brad Beck Reply-To: Brad Beck To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: The J2EE compatibility tests In-Reply-To: <5C375336-0731-11D9-8BB0-000D93C5B79C@gluecode.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200409151037.AA6094892@activation.net> <5C375336-0731-11D9-8BB0-000D93C5B79C@gluecode.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I believe you meant to say... "EJB 2.1 is a required part of J2EE 1.4" On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:07:36 -0700, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > > > On Sep 15, 2004, at 7:37 AM, John Woolsey wrote: > > > Are these publicly available yet? I heard they where going to be > > available because of JBoss certification or something. How about the > > EJB 1.1 spec tests? > > We can not publish the J2EE compatibility tests. The tests are owned > by Sun and only licensed to Apache for us to run them to determine > compatibility. I personally would love to have these tests publicly > available, but it is something for Sun to decide. > > As for your question on EJB 1.1, I am not allowed to give any > information on the tests themselves, but I can say that EJB 1.1 is a > required part of J2EE 1.4 (required for backward compatibility). > > -dain > >