geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alan Cabrera <Alan.Cabr...@reuters.com>
Subject RE: Socket Fun
Date Wed, 01 Sep 2004 12:51:50 GMT
How do you perform your measurement?   Can you provide a code snippet?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Woolsey [mailto:jwoolsey@activation.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:37 AM
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Socket Fun
> 
> Good idea but I am using different ObjectOutputStreams. The first one
is
> to a byte array and the other is to a Socket Stream. The difference is
4
> bytes 179 for the socket and 174. I am going to guess it is a length
> variable that is added to the byte array stream. I have gone to
> completely serializing outside the socket stream which works, but I
> thought the difference was interesting and worth bringing up.
> 
> 
>                                  - bfn - JAW
> 
> adam wrote:
> 
> > Referencing by ObjectOutputStream.  The second time you serialize
the
> > object out over the stream, ObjectOutputStream replaces it with a
> > reference back to the one it just sent.  In one of the older JVMs,
> > this kept things that were serialized from being garbage collected,
> > although that's been fixed now.
> >
> > Adam
> >
> > John Woolsey wrote:
> >
> >> I am working on my RMI implementation and I was using the
> >> ObjectOutputStream. I made a function serialize that I used to find
> >> the length of the outbound data. Then I wrote the same object to a
> >> socket. The sizes where different ?!? Anyone have any idea why?
> >>
> >>
> >>                           - thanx - JAW
> >>
> >
> >
> 




-----------------------------------------------------------------
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more
information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.


Mime
View raw message