geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com>
Subject Re: Installing Confluence
Date Wed, 08 Sep 2004 20:59:34 GMT
I also volunteered to help when the original thread was going on.  Would be nice to see this
setup.

-David

On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:08:20AM -0700, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> Does anyone know where we are at with this?  I am more than willing to 
> help.
> 
> -dain
> 
> 
> On Jul 22, 2004, at 9:11 PM, jastrachan@mac.com wrote:
> 
> >I'm willing to help out - I just about qualify for the requirements I 
> >guess.
> >
> >On 23 Jul 2004, at 02:51, Jeff Turner wrote:
> >>Would anyone else be willing to help with care and feeding of an ASF
> >>Confluence instance?  Requirements for the job:
> >>
> >> a) an ASF committer, preferably been around a few years
> >> b) know how to deploy a webapp and admin a Tomcat instance
> >> c) somewhat unix-savvy
> >> d) willing to commit random bits of time for months to come to do 
> >>things
> >>    like upgrades
> >>
> >>If there's a volunteer or two, I guess the next steps would be to 
> >>hold a
> >>(PMC-ratified) vote and send a mail off to infrastructure@ for advice.
> >>They may wish to delay installation until a successor to nagoya is 
> >>ready.
> >>
> >>
> >>--Jeff
> >>
> >>On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 05:11:40PM +0100, jastrachan@mac.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>>On 21 Jul 2004, at 17:15, Matt Kurjanowicz wrote:
> >>>>Hmm, are we moving a little too fast on moving to Confluence?   Like
> >>>>someone said earlier, we've already switched wiki's once, and I 
> >>>>don't
> >>>>know (beyond wiki -> xdoc) what benefits Confluence has over Wikis.
> >>>
> >>>Security, features, wiki language, macros for integrating with unit
> >>>test code / JIRA reports - but mostly its just a nice tool to use 
> >>>etc.
> >>>
> >>>Its like saying, hey this JIRA things OK but whats wrong with 
> >>>bugzilla.
> >>>If you've used both you'll know what I mean.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>It may even be easier to update the tool (wiki->xdoc) to understand
> >>>>the wiki we have now, rather than transferring the entire site over 
> >>>>to
> >>>>a different wiki system, with yet another syntax...
> >>>
> >>>There's not that much content. But we could start with just the 
> >>>manual
> >>>in the new wiki, then see how we get on. The great thing about this
> >>>internet thing is we can link across websites :). So even if the old
> >>>wiki stays around for a while its no biggie
> >>>
> >>>James
> >>>-------
> >>>http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >James
> >-------
> >http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> >

Mime
View raw message