Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38983 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2004 04:31:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 04:31:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 56020 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2004 04:31:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 55986 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2004 04:31:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 55973 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2004 04:31:04 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [66.235.180.72] (HELO sls-dc1p2.dca2.superb.net) (66.235.180.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:30:59 -0700 Received: from [10.10.12.32] (ip2.198.145.31.iinet.com [198.145.31.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by sls-dc1p2.dca2.superb.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6S4XCc7027524 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:33:13 -0700 Message-ID: <41072BF9.7020500@gluecode.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:30:49 -0700 From: Jeremy Boynes User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: [Fwd: FW: EWS and Geronimo (THANKS)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Forwarded on behalf of Alan who is having mailer problems -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FW: EWS and Geronimo (THANKS) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:28:14 -0400 From: Alan D. Cabrera To: Ok. Two more questions. First, it seems that a change in EWS has not been propagated to Geronimo and we're getting this error: C:\dev\geronimo\modules\axis\src\java\org\apache\geronimo\axis\GeronimoW sDeployContext.java:27: org.apache.geronimo.axis.GeronimoWsDeployContext is not abstract and does not override abstract method isCompile() in org.apache.geronimo.ews.ws4j2ee.toWs.Ws4J2 eeDeployContext public class GeronimoWsDeployContext implements Ws4J2eeDeployContext { ^ 1 error Second, you have a jndi.properties file in your jar with the following contents: java.naming.factory.initial=org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContextFactory java.naming.provider.url=jnp://localhost:1099 java.naming.factory.url.pkgs=org.jboss.naming:org.jnp.interfaces Not sure if this is kosher, use wise and ASF policy wise. As for the former, the Geronimo server barfs when it can't find org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContextFactory when it loads up the remote JMX server. Can we remove it? Regards, Alan > -----Original Message----- > From: Srinath Perera [mailto:hemapani@opensource.lk] > Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 8:42 PM > To: dev@geronimo.apache.org > Subject: Re: EWS and Geronimo > > We were wondering should ews go to ws-fx (to a webservice project ) or in > to the geronimo. It is still not decided. I accept the fact that it should > use the geronimo group ID if it continue to use the Geronimo package > space. > Or else that should replace with "ws" and put the geronimo specific code > in to geronimo axis module. To me there are good reasons to both and do > not mind either. > > Thanks > Srinath > > > Why doesn't EWS use the Geronimo maven group id? Its code is in the > > Geronimo package-space. > > Just wondering. > > Regards, > > > > Alan