Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89285 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2004 02:49:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2004 02:49:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 95933 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2004 02:49:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 95354 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2004 02:49:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 95341 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2004 02:49:07 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SB_NEW_BULK,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [64.233.170.195] (HELO mproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with SMTP; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 19:49:04 -0700 Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 78so1574rnl for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 19:49:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.164.69 with SMTP id m69mr134401rne; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 19:49:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19e0530f0407221949df6bd98@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:49:02 -0400 From: Davanum Srinivas Reply-To: dims@apache.org To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]webservice deployment in geronimo In-Reply-To: <32409D56-DC09-11D8-BD30-000393DB559A@coredevelopers.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <55991.220.247.207.122.1090412828.squirrel@220.247.207.122> <58315.220.247.207.122.1090462925.squirrel@220.247.207.122> <32409D56-DC09-11D8-BD30-000393DB559A@coredevelopers.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Srinath, org.apache.geronimo.ews.ws4j2ee.utils.EWSTask is missing as well in the EWS project -- dims On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:01:46 -0700, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > > > On Jul 21, 2004, at 7:22 PM, Srinath Perera wrote: > > > the patch is posted to JIRA @ > > http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/ManageAttachments.jspa?id=22172 :) > > > >> So ews generates java source code and compiles it? Is there any way > >> to > >> skip the Java source generation and thus the need for a compiler? > >> -dain > > > > I think code generation is a must as the axis stub/skeltons need to be > > generated anyway. > > > > but there may be a way out. We can provide the ews as a tools and ask > > user > > to run it(in here the ews can find the tools.jar in the same way > > ant/maven > > find it, via shell script) and then geronimo can deploy the generated > > code. (If I am right sun RI ask use to run the generater ws* before > > deploy > > code). > > > > To me it is better if we can say to the user "give us the bundle the > > J2EE > > spec talk about and we will do the rest!!!", but if there practical > > problems I think it is ok to ask user to run EWS themselves and then > > deploy. > > If we need to generate Java source code and compile it, then I would > rather have the deployment process simply do that. What I was really > getting at is can we simply generate the byte code directly and skip > the Java source generation and compile steps? > > -dain > > -- Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/