Return-Path: 
 <geronimo-dev-return-7353-apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 30273 invoked from network); 27 May 2004 16:31:34 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 27 May 2004 16:31:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 44527 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2004 16:27:05 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 44432 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2004 16:27:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:geronimo-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 44203 invoked by uid 98); 27 May 2004 16:27:01 -0000
Received: from dain@coredevelopers.net by hermes.apache.org by uid 82 with
 qmail-scanner-1.20
 (clamuko: 0.70.  Clear:RC:0(209.233.18.245):.
 Processed in 0.054407 secs); 27 May 2004 16:27:01 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: dain@coredevelopers.net via hermes.apache.org
X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.20 (Clear:RC:0(209.233.18.245):. Processed in 0.054407
 secs)
Received: from unknown (HELO public.coredevelopers.net) (209.233.18.245)
  by hermes.apache.org with SMTP; 27 May 2004 16:27:01 -0000
Received: from [10.101.105.100] (dain [208.42.65.236])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by public.coredevelopers.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 8.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id
 2CC4D444F6
	for <geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org>;
 Thu, 27 May 2004 09:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613)
In-Reply-To: <40B61374.2090207@cpphacker.co.uk>
References: <FF7CE36846E01B439945B55FFB1DF5BEF71F@customer.panix.com>
 <40B61374.2090207@cpphacker.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <9C38FE44-AFFA-11D8-A8BD-000393DB559A@coredevelopers.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dain Sundstrom <dain@coredevelopers.net>
Subject: Re: Geronimo code format
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 11:26:30 -0500
To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613)
X-Spam-Rating: hermes.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Please, no flame war over code style.  We are sticking with what we 
have.

-dain

On May 27, 2004, at 11:12 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote:

> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>
>> Personally, I think that K&R formatting is pretty crappy.  I feel that
>> strongly about it.  Does everyone else like K&R?  (The coding format,
>> I'm sure that the guys a standup people.)
>
> <rant>
> I think the K&R formatting style is an abomination
> that should be stricken from the face of the planet.
> I find K&R formatted code to be nearly unreadable,
> certainly much less readable than code formattted
> Allman style.
>
> Why in the @#!^ Sun picked that for the
> Java Coding Conventions is beyond me... but
> I consider it a huge mistake, as oodles of people
> now believe that K&R style is "java style."
>
> I've even had people look at my Java code
> and go "Why do you do the curly braces
> C++ style?" like the formatting is tied
> to the language or something. UUggghh...
>
> </rant>
>
>
> TTYL,
>
>
> Phil R.