Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49085 invoked from network); 30 May 2004 20:11:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 30 May 2004 20:11:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 71015 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2004 20:11:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 70723 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2004 20:11:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 70698 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2004 20:11:29 -0000 Received: from [209.233.18.245] (HELO public.coredevelopers.net) (209.233.18.245) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 May 2004 13:11:29 -0700 Received: from coredevelopers.net (gateway [192.168.2.253]) by public.coredevelopers.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 8.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id 242D443332 for ; Sun, 30 May 2004 13:10:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <40BA3FEC.7070809@coredevelopers.net> Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 13:11:24 -0700 From: Jeremy Boynes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Default vs. demo security Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Alan has a config with a dmeo of security tied into Jetty - should we merge this into the default configuration (so that we have default system, admin and user level accounts)? -- Jeremy