Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21059 invoked from network); 26 May 2004 02:04:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 26 May 2004 02:04:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 15473 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2004 02:05:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 15322 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2004 02:04:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 15254 invoked by uid 98); 26 May 2004 02:04:58 -0000 Received: from jeremy@coredevelopers.net by hermes.apache.org by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamuko: 0.70. Clear:RC:0(209.233.18.245):. Processed in 0.063247 secs); 26 May 2004 02:04:58 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: jeremy@coredevelopers.net via hermes.apache.org X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.20 (Clear:RC:0(209.233.18.245):. Processed in 0.063247 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO public.coredevelopers.net) (209.233.18.245) by hermes.apache.org with SMTP; 26 May 2004 02:04:58 -0000 Received: from coredevelopers.net (gateway [192.168.2.253]) by public.coredevelopers.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 8.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id E29712DBB0 for ; Tue, 25 May 2004 19:03:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <40B3FB1A.6030703@coredevelopers.net> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 19:04:10 -0700 From: Jeremy Boynes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Changes to OpenEJB interceptor stack References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: hermes.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > Similar thing to what you're saying. I'm just giving a heads up. > > I guess we should share as much threadlocal as we can. I think that the > security interceptors will have to be left out. > > > Alan > > I think some of this applies to other components as well e.g. run-as for servlets. So both the EJBIdentityInterceptor and the equivalent servlet Handler/Valve could get it from the core. -- Jeremy