Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10576 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2004 10:35:30 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Apr 2004 10:35:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 51748 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2004 10:35:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51616 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2004 10:35:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51600 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2004 10:35:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtpout.mac.com) (17.250.248.87) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Apr 2004 10:35:21 -0000 Received: from mac.com (smtpin01-en2 [10.13.10.146]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id i3LAZL57025261 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 03:35:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (82-35-107-109.cable.ubr06.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.107.109]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin01/MantshX 3.0) with ESMTP id i3LAZJgQ022779 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 03:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613) In-Reply-To: <20040421024725.GA16740@sweetums.ce1.client2.attbi.com> References: <20040421024725.GA16740@sweetums.ce1.client2.attbi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <942F919E-937F-11D8-BDE1-000A959D0312@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: jastrachan@mac.com Subject: Re: Release this week Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:35:16 +0100 To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 21 Apr 2004, at 03:47, David Blevins wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 02:41:40PM -0500, Dain Sundstrom wrote: >> Geronimo is hackable now, so I think we should do a binary (alpha) >> release. I still need to get the OpenEJB deployer and jars into the >> Geronimo assembly but that should not take that long. Does anyone >> else >> have something they need to get in before we do a release? > I can think of plenty of things, but that's what makes your idea of > publishing daily builds such a good one :) > > I'm already doing nightly build/tests on minotaur and nagoya. It > should be fairly easy to timestamp each build and publish it *if* the > tests pass. +1 on a release and on daily snapshots. > Maybe at some point later, I can find an easy way to use the cvs > commit messages as the release notes. Maybe we should install JIRA? I've found on other projects that as issues come up, bugs are found or things need to be fixed, you enter an issue into JIRA using it as todo-list and bug tracker - then it generates auto-release notes for you... http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/BrowseProject.jspa? id=10242&report=changelog plus then you get a road map to see what needs to be fixed before the next release... http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/BrowseProject.jspa? id=10242&report=roadmap and you can tie in the issue ID to the CVS commit too if you want James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/