Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 09:14:27 -0700
Subject: Re: [Connector] UserTransaction incomplete
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553)
From: David Jencks <david@coredevelopers.net>
To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <07258F4244D6F649B1A78993D070B7CA8E0BEB@ACSPMXE02>
Message-Id: <7A538656-87E5-11D8-8968-003065F4889C@coredevelopers.net>


On Tuesday, April 6, 2004, at 07:32 AM, Hamilton Verissimo de Oliveira 
(Engenharia - SPO) wrote:

> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:jeremy@coredevelopers.net]
>
>> Since the very beginning Geronimo has worked with other open source
>> projects to build a complete J2EE solution - OpenEJB is one of those,
>> Jetty and JOTM are others. However, at the time OpenEJB provided 
>> EJB1.1
>> functionality and quite a few people have worked to bring it up to the
>> 2.1 level - given the size of an EJB project, it's not really 
>> surprising
>> there is overlap in the communities.
>
> Ok, I was just wondering. In a complex project is difficult to relies 
> on
> external implementation, mostly when external implementations handles 
> core
> things. On the other side is usually good to avoid the NIH 
> anti-pattern. So
> you need to reach a balance.
>
> Btw I thought JOTM was GPL. I'm using it too, but seems that its Xid is
> messing the expected oracle Xid pattern. I'll check that later.

At one point Oracle would accept other peoples xids only if the global 
and branch ids were exactly 64 bytes long.  There were some messages 
over the weekend on the jotm list about this, they might have fixed it 
in the last couple of days.

thanks
david jencks

>
>
> Regards,
> hammett
>