Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 74109 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2004 20:18:56 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2004 20:18:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 52702 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2004 20:18:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52640 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2004 20:18:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52627 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2004 20:18:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ussjmh01.bea.com) (63.96.162.5) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2004 20:18:38 -0000 Received: from san-francisco.bea.com (san-francisco.bea.com [10.32.0.10]) by ussjmh01.bea.com (Switch-3.0.5/Switch-3.0.0) with ESMTP id i2VKIiXu004815 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:18:44 -0800 Received: from pcal-w2k.bea.com ([172.17.27.57]) by san-francisco.bea.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA26155; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:18:43 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20040331121752.02998820@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: pcal@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:19:01 -0800 To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org, From: Patrick Calahan Subject: RE: Java API for Metadata In-Reply-To: <200403310742.i2V7gZo13556@kiku.7777.net> References: <5.0.0.25.0.20040326190539.02bb2ec0@127.0.0.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Right, I think that's the only part of the build that hasn't been teased out yet. Will fix that, thanks. -p At 04:42 PM 3/31/2004 +0900, Ias wrote: >Thanks for your great work. I just feel like introducing it to my article in >May issue of Microsoftware, a Korean journal for software developers. > >By the way, I actually failed to build JAM first. I figured it out by adding > > > >to jsr173 target in build.xml for JAM. (I guess it was also because I hadn't >built xmlbeans before building JAM.) > >Regards, > >Ias > >========================================================= >Lee, Changshin (Korean name) >Ias (International name) > Company Web Site: http://www.tmax.co.kr > Personal Web Site: http://www.iasandcb.pe.kr >--------------------------------------------------------- >JSR 201, 204, 222 and 224 Expert Group Member >Apache Web Services Project Member >R&D Center >Tmax Soft, Inc. >========================================================= > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Patrick Calahan [mailto:pcal@bea.com] > > Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 12:24 PM > > To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: JAM: Java API for Metadata > > > > Hello everyone. I am a committer on Xml-Beans, another > > project currently in the Apache Incubator. As part of my > > work there, I have developed an API for representing Java > > types and their associated metadata which I believe would be > > of general use to the community. > > > > The API is called 'JAM' - the Java API for Metadata. On the > > surface, it looks quite a bit like Reflection or the Doclet > > API, but it affords a greater level of flexibility and > > convenience, and in particular provides solutions for a > > number of thorny problems posed by JSR175. > > > > I have had a few discussions with some folks on > > general@incubator.apache.org about possibly spinning JAM up > > as an independent project from xbeans. It was suggested that > > it would be useful to test the waters in some other projects > > such as Geronimo to see if JAM would indeed be generally > > useful. So, here I am testing. :) > > > > Anyway, if you want more gory details, I have temporarily > > posted some white papers and the API docs here: > > > > http://www.pcal.net/jam > > > > Any feedback is more than welcome. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Patrick > >