geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject RE: MetaData and J2EE
Date Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:37:07 GMT
We are saying the same thing.  What I meant was that it would be neat to
have a tool that did this.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Fletcher [mailto:jfletcher@voicelog.net]
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:51 AM
> To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: MetaData and J2EE
> 
> I always considered this type of functionality as part of the build
> environment.  Whether your source files used xdoclet, or JDK 1.5
> metadata, or you coded all classes by hand shouldn't matter to a
server
> like Geronimo.  By the time the jar (or ear, war, ...) file gets to
the
> server, it should look the same, right?  So I'm having trouble
> envisioning how we "include something like this in Geronimo".
> 
> Jeff
> 
> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> 
> >Yes, it does.  However, I am interested in using JDK 1.5's metadata
> >facility.
> >
> >
> >Alan
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Jeff Fletcher [mailto:jfletcher@voicelog.net]
> >>Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 10:54 AM
> >>To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>Subject: Re: MetaData and J2EE
> >>
> >>Doesn't xdoclet provide that functionality?
> >>Jeff
> >>
> >>Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>What are your thoughts on annotating classes to expose beans and
web
> >>>services?  Seems like a neat idea that I know that M$ is very
> >>>successful with in integrating simple C# classes.  I think that
this
> >>>is something we should include something like this in Geronimo.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Regards,
> >>>
> >>>Alan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >

Mime
View raw message