geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <da...@coredevelopers.net>
Subject Re: velocity-based debug console
Date Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:21:58 GMT

On Monday, February 16, 2004, at 02:55 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:

>
> On Feb 16, 2004, at 5:03 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> <howl of protest>I would rather you used one less level so we don't 
>> have to rewrite all of top level maven.xml to include it in the 
>> normal build. </howl of protest>
>>
>
> Why would you have to rewrite?

It might not be as bad as I fear, but currently maven.xml is designed 
to build sub projects in ./A/B  (A == specs, modules, B== connector, 
kernel, etc).  adding another "A" type is trivial.  Adding another 
layer (/A/B/C) will take some study to do.

thanks
david jencks
>
>
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Monday, February 16, 2004, at 01:53 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>
>>> If no one objects then, I'm going to go with :
>>>
>>> /geronimo/applications/console/jmx-debug
>>>
>>> and get things in there and working so others can play.  Right now, 
>>> it's just read-only, but still vaguely useful.
>>>
>>> I'll wait a bit for any agreement or howls of protest.
>>>
>>> geir
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 15, 2004, at 11:09 PM, n. alex rupp wrote:
>>>
>>>> We've got the following:
>>>>
>>>> CLI console
>>>> Swing console
>>>> Web console
>>>> JMX debugging console
>>>>
>>>> So perhaps we should have:
>>>>
>>>> /geronimo/applications/console/cli
>>>> /geronimo/applications/console/swing
>>>> /geronimo/applications/console/web
>>>> /geronimo/applications/console/jmx-debug
>>>>
>>>> Can they all be classified as applications?  I know the two web 
>>>> apps can--if the
>>>> other two can as well I'm game for an "applications" branch : )  We 
>>>> should also
>>>> consider how to name the  .WAR files for the two web applications 
>>>> in this list.
>>>>
>>>> I guess "jmx-debug.war" and "server-management.war" might work out. 
>>>>  So you'd
>>>> have "...8080/jmx-debug/" and "...8080/server-management/"
>>>>
>>>> I'm happy with however you guys decide to name these, as long as 
>>>> they make some
>>>> logical sense to the users and aren't any more verbose than is 
>>>> necessary.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> N. Alex Rupp
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Dain Sundstrom" <dain@coredevelopers.net>
>>>> To: <geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 1:24 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: velocity-based debug console
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I think we need a new naming convention.  The console-<type> was
>>>>> designed with the idea that we would have a single console of each 
>>>>> type
>>>>> (e.g., console-web, console-gui, console-cli).  Now the new stuff 
>>>>> is
>>>>> not a management console, just a debug tool, so console-<type>

>>>>> doesn't
>>>>> really fit.  Instead debug-web, would fit better, unfortunately 
>>>>> that
>>>>> name implies it is a debug tool for web applications, which it
>>>>> definitely is not.  This is why I think we need a new naming
>>>>> convention.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also Jeremy suggested the other day that we put these modules into 
>>>>> a
>>>>> new applications "modules-tree" (e.g. geronimo/modules/console-web
>>>>> becomes geronimo/applications/console-web/).  Another idea is to 
>>>>> use a
>>>>> two level deep tree (e.g. geronimo/modules/console-debug becomes
>>>>> geronimo/applications/console/web/).
>>>>>
>>>>> What ever we decide, I think we need to readdress the naming 
>>>>> convention
>>>>> for applications.
>>>>>
>>>>> -dain
>>>>
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Geir Magnusson Jr                                   203-247-1713(m)
>>> geir@4quarters.com
>>>
>>
>>
> -- 
> Geir Magnusson Jr                                   203-247-1713(m)
> geir@4quarters.com
>


Mime
View raw message