geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@4quarters.com>
Subject Re: velocity-based debug console
Date Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:55:18 GMT

On Feb 16, 2004, at 5:03 PM, David Jencks wrote:

> <howl of protest>I would rather you used one less level so we don't 
> have to rewrite all of top level maven.xml to include it in the normal 
> build. </howl of protest>
>

Why would you have to rewrite?


> david jencks
>
> On Monday, February 16, 2004, at 01:53 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
>> If no one objects then, I'm going to go with :
>>
>> /geronimo/applications/console/jmx-debug
>>
>> and get things in there and working so others can play.  Right now, 
>> it's just read-only, but still vaguely useful.
>>
>> I'll wait a bit for any agreement or howls of protest.
>>
>> geir
>>
>>
>> On Feb 15, 2004, at 11:09 PM, n. alex rupp wrote:
>>
>>> We've got the following:
>>>
>>> CLI console
>>> Swing console
>>> Web console
>>> JMX debugging console
>>>
>>> So perhaps we should have:
>>>
>>> /geronimo/applications/console/cli
>>> /geronimo/applications/console/swing
>>> /geronimo/applications/console/web
>>> /geronimo/applications/console/jmx-debug
>>>
>>> Can they all be classified as applications?  I know the two web apps 
>>> can--if the
>>> other two can as well I'm game for an "applications" branch : )  We 
>>> should also
>>> consider how to name the  .WAR files for the two web applications in 
>>> this list.
>>>
>>> I guess "jmx-debug.war" and "server-management.war" might work out.  
>>> So you'd
>>> have "...8080/jmx-debug/" and "...8080/server-management/"
>>>
>>> I'm happy with however you guys decide to name these, as long as 
>>> they make some
>>> logical sense to the users and aren't any more verbose than is 
>>> necessary.
>>>
>>> --
>>> N. Alex Rupp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Dain Sundstrom" <dain@coredevelopers.net>
>>> To: <geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
>>> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 1:24 PM
>>> Subject: Re: velocity-based debug console
>>>
>>>
>>>> I think we need a new naming convention.  The console-<type> was
>>>> designed with the idea that we would have a single console of each 
>>>> type
>>>> (e.g., console-web, console-gui, console-cli).  Now the new stuff is
>>>> not a management console, just a debug tool, so console-<type> 
>>>> doesn't
>>>> really fit.  Instead debug-web, would fit better, unfortunately that
>>>> name implies it is a debug tool for web applications, which it
>>>> definitely is not.  This is why I think we need a new naming
>>>> convention.
>>>>
>>>> Also Jeremy suggested the other day that we put these modules into a
>>>> new applications "modules-tree" (e.g. geronimo/modules/console-web
>>>> becomes geronimo/applications/console-web/).  Another idea is to 
>>>> use a
>>>> two level deep tree (e.g. geronimo/modules/console-debug becomes
>>>> geronimo/applications/console/web/).
>>>>
>>>> What ever we decide, I think we need to readdress the naming 
>>>> convention
>>>> for applications.
>>>>
>>>> -dain
>>>
>>>
>> -- 
>> Geir Magnusson Jr                                   203-247-1713(m)
>> geir@4quarters.com
>>
>
>
-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                   203-247-1713(m)
geir@4quarters.com


Mime
View raw message