Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Is SubsystemRouter thread safe?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 20:13:16 -0500
Message-ID: <FF7CE36846E01B439945B55FFB1DF5BE1472@customer.panix.com>
Thread-Topic: Is SubsystemRouter thread safe?
Thread-Index: AcPl9Kj8I81izmVzRp6JEKVi3xKRsgAEFlpw
From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <adc@toolazydogs.com>
To: <geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org>

No problems, just wondering if it was safe.


Regards,
Alan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiram Chirino [mailto:hiram@coredevelopers.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 6:15 PM
> To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Is SubsystemRouter thread safe?
>=20
> It's using a copy on write map.  We might need to a synchronized block
> on the read side still.  Are you having issues with it?  I've heard
but
> have not confirmed that If you have a machine with multiple processor
> caches the un-synchronized read of the map might be a problem since it
> could be looking at a real old cached copy of the map.
>=20
> Hiram Chirino wrote:
>=20
> > Yes it is.
> >
> > Cabrera, Alan wrote:
> >
> >> More specifically, can I have two TransportLoaders feeding into the
> >> same SubsystemRouter?
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Alan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>       Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
> >>
> >> Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for
more
> >> information and to register, visit
<http://www.reuters.com/messaging>
> >>
> >> Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
> >> sender, except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the
> >> views of The Reuters Group.
> >>
> >