Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 88149 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2003 06:33:27 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 2003 06:33:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 95864 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2003 06:33:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95698 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2003 06:32:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95685 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2003 06:32:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO public.coredevelopers.net) (209.233.18.245) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 2003 06:32:58 -0000 Received: from coredevelopers.net (gateway [192.168.2.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by public.coredevelopers.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 8.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id 04FBD1C298 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 22:30:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 22:33:07 -0800 Subject: Re: A Letter from JBoss's lawyers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Dain Sundstrom To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 10:13 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > That's good to hear. What would help now would be for all Geronimo > Committers to take a momentary pause from active development (so that > we get > all hands on board), review the code, review the claims, and provide a > technical response similar to the one posted by Jim, except one that > reflects a voted consensus of the Committers. The JBoss letter did bring up one good point, can we finally get trace level logging into commons-logging so every project in the world doesn't need to adapt the Log4j examples? Does anyone here have influence with the commons-logging Committers ? -dain