Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 55995 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2003 19:25:01 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2003 19:25:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 49629 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2003 19:24:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49573 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2003 19:24:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49555 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2003 19:24:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp001.mail.ukl.yahoo.com) (217.12.11.32) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2003 19:24:43 -0000 Received: from pacemetrics.plus.com (HELO ?192.168.101.63?) (james?strachan@81.174.226.122 with plain) by smtp1.mail.vip.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Nov 2003 19:24:45 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v606) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: James Strachan Subject: Re: [committers] can you build the website? Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 19:24:37 +0000 To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.606) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 24 Nov 2003, at 19:23, Aaron Mulder wrote: > On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote: >> They don't, as far as I know. Geronimo is hardly the only project to >> raise >> a concern about "190MB of generated artifacts in CVS?!" There are >> various >> alternative solutions being looked at, including a build server. So >> look >> for things to change down the road. No one is trying to do stupid >> things. >> They just want to make sure that in the event of a problem, we can >> recover >> in a relatively painless fashion. > > The truth is, if the whole thing is generated from source files in > CVS, so long as the actual source code is backed up, the web site CAN > be > recovered in a relatively painless fashion -- just restore the CVS > backup > and build the site. Am I missing something? This is true of all maven-generated sites. IIRC some Jakarta Commons sites are like this and the Maven site itself is like this too. I guess eventually we could just do a file system backup of the last-deployed site in case of error. Or as Noel says, have some kinda build server. James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/