Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Message-ID: <3FBCA995.7090403@coredevelopers.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:46:29 +0000
From: Jules Gosnell <jules@coredevelopers.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030718
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: ObjectWeb and Geronimo communication
References: <20031118222918.GA8916@sweetums.ce1.client2.attbi.com>
 <872FEA74-1A21-11D8-95D2-000A959D0312@yahoo.co.uk>
 <AA08900C-1A5E-11D8-9854-000A95A01192@optonline.net>
 <707A4A7E-1AD5-11D8-95D2-000A959D0312@yahoo.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <707A4A7E-1AD5-11D8-95D2-000A959D0312@yahoo.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

James,


'Fractal Composition Framework'....

sounds interesting...

does it have anything to do with decomposing and storing replicated 
state around a cluster? If so, please would post a link.

Cheers,


Jules


James Strachan wrote:
> n 18 Nov 2003, at 23:04, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> 
>> On Nov 18, 2003, at 6:47 PM, James Strachan wrote:
>>
>>> Just for other geronimo folks who couldn't make the BOF at ApacheCon 
>>> (shame! it was great, as is the conference as a whole!) I'd just like 
>>> to mention that we might wanna look at JORAM as a JMS implementation 
>>> for Geronimo.
>>>
>>> Right now JORAM is LGPL so the ASF wouldn't be able to distribute it 
>>> as a part of Geronimo - or to certify it - though there is a chance 
>>> the LGPL could be changed to BSD- Jean-Pierre said he's gonna try 
>>> change it if we're interested.
>>>
>>> It'd be nice if someone in the geronimo community could take a look 
>>> at integrating JORAM into Geronimo (I here the JCA connectors are 
>>> looking good) then we could try out Geronimo with a full 1.1 JMS 
>>> provider. (We should do the same with openjms when it reaches 1.1 as 
>>> well).
>>
>>
>> I've been looking for something to do, so if no one else has decided 
>> to tackle this while I was flying home, I volunteer.
> 
> 
> Great stuff.
> 
> Incidentally I read through some of the other Objectweb projects on the 
> plane back from Vegas; there's a bunch of other projects that we should 
> take a look at. Admitedly lots of them are *GPL though if we were to ask 
> really nicely you never know...
> 
> So as well as JOTM and JORAM we might also wanna look at...
> 
> * C-JDBC - clustered JDBC, pretty handy
> * JORM (object repository mapping; could be handy for a CMP / JDO 
> implementation)
> * johnathan - an ORB if we need one for certification
> * kilim - configuration framework (have only read the glossy - have no 
> idea what this means :)
> * fractal composition framework - is there anything we can learn here & 
> maybe bridge things
> 
> Anyways those were the projects that piqued my interest - lets dive in & 
> see whats there that we can reuse & work with.
> 
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> 


-- 
/**********************************
  * Jules Gosnell
  * Partner
  * Core Developers Network (Europe)
  **********************************/