Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76499 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2003 19:41:09 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2003 19:41:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 18304 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2003 19:40:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 18235 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2003 19:40:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 18159 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2003 19:40:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2003 19:40:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 8445 invoked by uid 65534); 22 Nov 2003 19:40:53 -0000 Received: from dsl-082-082-137-042.arcor-ip.net (EHLO blue.home.com) (82.82.137.42) by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 22 Nov 2003 20:40:53 +0100 X-Authenticated: #449474 From: Mariano Kamp Reply-To: mariano.kamp@acm.org To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: new console-swing team Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 20:35:59 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <00cb01c3b129$b2f6cc80$8500000a@saussure> In-Reply-To: <00cb01c3b129$b2f6cc80$8500000a@saussure> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311222036.01093.mkamp@gmx.de> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I am probably blessed by being a late comer and haven't made any bitter=20 experience here before. Not sure if there has been?! Form the sidelines it = is=20 hard to believe that this discussion is all about the mails from last night= ?!=20 To me it seems, that the tone of the discussion is way to harsh and the=20 actual subject is just a tiny detail which needs to be worked out. I read=20 that there is nothing preventing a snapshot from being built. It just needs= =20 to be done in the right way, read delegating the responsibility for it up t= he=20 chain. If that means to obey to some rules, with the sake of being protecte= d=20 from being the subject of an individual litigation that seems to be fair=20 enough to me. Actually it sounds like the every day life - being part of=20 something bigger means to accomodate. And in case of the ASF I don't have t= he=20 feeling that these are unreasonable burdens as opposed to the real life I=20 encounter at my day job. I actually see it the other way around. All the AS= =46=20 cares for is the overhead. I have' nt seen anything saying how one must=20 develop the code itself. And that is the beef, isn't it. On a sidebar you also get the benefits of a community. Without the rules = it=20 is just a bunch of boxes running cvs, like sf. =20 I well remember the statements on the list from apache con. How great it = is=20 to work with brilliant people. That was much more fun to read ;-) I don't s= ee=20 that the administrational thing is preventing the brilliance thing. My two euro cents,=20 Cheers, Mariano =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/v7qfSraqt+SsFIMRAmceAJ9nEoN1VmD330cAWQ8FsvUvzRFIbgCdHvTF bBVeIRzoijtdrIGl1bhrN3U=3D =3DgehI =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----