geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeremy Boynes" <jer...@coredevelopers.net>
Subject RE: Status of JMS
Date Wed, 05 Nov 2003 15:10:56 GMT
I believe OpenJMS is compatible in binary form, but source suffers from the
Intalio indemnity problem.

JORAM was (is?) LGPL, but ObjectWeb have started to switch their projects to
an ASF-friendly license (ASM just switched to BSD for example).

--
Jeremy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 7:07 PM
> To: James Developers List; geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: dev@avalon.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Status of JMS
>
>
> Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> > James Strachan wrote:
> > > I'd use OpenJMS or JGroups for now. There is no JMS implementation
> > > inside Geronimo yet & I can't imagine there would be one for a while.
>
> > The intention is to integrate an existing JMS implementation
> using JCA now
> > that we have transaction and security inflow. I believe OpenJMS
> is working
> > on that; JORAM would be another possibility.
>
> Are the licenses for both of those compatible?
>
> 	--- Noel
>
>


Mime
View raw message