geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Strachan <james_strac...@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: Proposal: Change the way interceptors are stacked
Date Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:03:32 GMT

On 24 Nov 2003, at 01:26, David Blevins wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 05:47:40PM -0800, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> Currently the interceptor stack is built from the front backwards 
>> using
>> the addInterceptor method on the container.
>>
>> I would like to propose we change to build the stack in the opposite
>> order, from the back forward. This would allow us to make the next
>> interceptor a private final initialized in the Interceptor's
>> constructor. It also makes multi-headed interceptor chains easier to
>> understand which will help with OpenEJB integration, and simplifies 
>> the
>> code in the containers that builds the stacks.
>>
>
> +1
>
> I'll note for others reading that with the current front-back 
> (first-last) style of building the stack makes it impossible to add 
> another interceptor later -- it would actually end up after the 
> "final" interceptor in the chain and would never be invoked.  Putting 
> the final/end interceptor in the stack first allows you to keep adding 
> interceptors in front of it.

+1

Sounds convincing to me.

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/


Mime
View raw message