geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Allen Fogleson" <afogle...@blackboard.com>
Subject RE: new console-swing team
Date Fri, 21 Nov 2003 20:17:53 GMT
Alex;

Well, in my mind at least (but who knows with my mind sometimes), that
would be encapsulated in the view :)

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: n. alex rupp [mailto:rupp0035@umn.edu] 
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 3:12 PM
To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: new console-swing team


Al, we actually do share the same model--JMX : )

It's the custom addons to JMX to prettify the output that 
might not transfer too well between apps ; )
--
N.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Allen Fogleson" <afogleson@blackboard.com>
To: <geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org>; <mariano.kamp@acm.org>
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 2:12 PM
Subject: RE: new console-swing team


I have done a fair amount of swing development - although I suspect as
most here I have done much more work on thin clients, and the
model/controller side of things. 

I really wouldn't be a big fan of an swt stand-alone app (although I
admit to its better look and feel) As someone else pointed out the
supported OS' are limited for swt. 

I would disagree that the model cannot be shared with the apps. A
properly designed model should easily be shareable. Isn't that the idea
behind separation of concerns :)

Al

>>Just one more thing regarding the discussion on sharing model code
between 
>>clients. I am bit sceptic about sharing code between the web-console
and a 
>>standalone-client, but I can imagine that it would be much easier to
do so 
>>with a swing and an eclipse app.



Mime
View raw message