geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Davanum Srinivas <d...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [jsr109] JAXR
Date Fri, 07 Nov 2003 06:08:37 GMT
Srinath,

I was thinking more in the lines of getting the JUDDI guys to implement a client-side JAXR
Impl
that can talk to any UDDI backend.

-- dims

--- Srinath Perera <hemapani@vijayaba.cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
> Hi Richard, All;
> 
> let us use JAXR RI to develop the JSR109 impl (let us stick to spec
> feature's only prob is license I believe)
> 
> I do not see why we can't do JAXR impl, but let us get JSR109 impl archi
> sorted out first. then have go at the JAXR .. but let us keep two
> separated.
> 
> We do have people :) there are Chatura, Dasarath, and Priyanga  who did
> the announce with me., you, Jeremy, Luis, Ias, myself 
> plus Guillaume said he will help us as well.
> 
> what do you think 
> 
> thank 
> 
> Srinath
>  
> On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 22:31, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> > +1 for doing an independent implementation.
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jeremy Boynes" <jeremy@coredevelopers.net>
> > To: <geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 10:22 PM
> > Subject: RE: [jsr109] JAXR
> > 
> > 
> > > IANAL, but I believe the issue is with the Supplemental Binary Code
> > License,
> > > section B, para 1, item iv) and v)
> > >
> > > [you]
> > > (iv) only distribute the Software subject to a license agreement that
> > > protects Sun's interests consistent with the terms contained in this
> > > Agreement
> > >
> > > (v) agree to defend and indemnify Sun and its licensors from and against
> > any
> > > damages, costs, liabilities, settlement amounts and/or expenses (including
> > > attorneys' fees) incurred in connection with any claim, lawsuit or action
> > by
> > > any third party that arises or results from the use or distribution of any
> > > and all Programs and/or Software
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jeremy
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: news [mailto:news@sea.gmane.org]On Behalf Of Richard Monson-Haefel
> > > > Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:40 AM
> > > > To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > Subject: [jsr109] JAXR
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > JSR 109 requires support for JAXR. Specifically, it requires that J2EE
> > > > components (ejbs, servlets/jsps, endpoints, etc.) have access to a
> > working
> > > > JAXR provider.  The WS-I supports/condones/whatever the use of UDDI, so
> > we
> > > > need a JAXR provider that at least supports UDDI (version 2.0).
> > > >
> > > > One way to address this is to write our own JAXR provider, but I
> > > > would like
> > > > to avoid that if possible. Ideally I would like to use the JAXR
> > reference
> > > > implementation provided by Sun Microsystems. What is the licensing
> > issues
> > > > with regard to using Sun's J2EE RI code?  I've heard a couple
> > > > people suggest
> > > > using various parts of the RI in other "subprojects", but I'm not sure
> > if
> > > > that's allowed by the RI license.
> > > >
> > > > Full functionality with JAXR is (IMO) far more important than
> > performance.
> > > > Its kind of hard to imagine many situations in which a really
> > > > fast JAXR impl
> > > > is needed. If performance is not an issue, than it would be best
> > > > (again IMO)
> > > > to use the RI implementation of JAXR and contribute back to that
> > > > rather than
> > > > roll our own. Again, I'm not totally sure if that's feasible or
> > advisable
> > > > and would appreciate any feedback from Apache wonks or anyone.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Richard
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > 
> 


=====
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/

Mime
View raw message