geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "gianny DAMOUR" <>
Subject Re: Competing J2EE Connector implementation architectures
Date Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:07:05 GMT
David Jencks wrote:
>Gianny Damour and I have developed alternate partial implementations of the 
>JCA ConnectionManager.  We haven't been able to convince each other of the 
>merits of our own approach, so I think we need some broader community 
>review and input.  We also need an easier way to further develop our ideas 
>in public.
I allow me to rephrase this a little. I am convinced that an Interceptor 
implementation is a possible approach. However, I am also convinced that my 
approach - note this significant bias - is more flexible.

>What I'd like to do is make 2 branches and check one proposal into each.  
>I'd like some advice on what to call the branches.  Here are a couple of 
I appreciate this proposal. However, I do not believe that this will be 
required: I understand what you have implemented and I will be glad to try 
to contribute on this code-base. I think that this is a "wise" decision 
based on a simple fact: this is your second implementation.

Moreover, it seems that some people are waiting for the foundations of the 
J2EECA architecture in order to start the implementation of message 
endpoints delivery. So, let's give them these foundations asap.

Whatever, I am ready to explain in details why I prefer my proposal.


Découvrez les nouvelles émoticônes animées de 
MSN Messenger nouvelle formule

View raw message