geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "gianny DAMOUR" <>
Subject Re: [webapp deployment] Progress (was Re: [Deployment] Application Deployment Status)
Date Thu, 09 Oct 2003 01:46:26 GMT
Greg Wilkins wrote:
>Note that I don't think that common deployment behaviour can go in an
>Abstract base class, as we already have AbstractManagedObject that services
>need to extend.  The common deployment behaviour will probly need to go
>in a DeploymentSupport class or on the DeploymentController itself.
I understand your point, however I believe that this is not an issue to have 
a base-class:

Suppose that a base-class provides this common deployment behaviour. In 
order to write a deployer, you can either extend this base-class or write an 
inner-class, which extends it. In other words, if one can not extend the 
base-class, one still have the possibility to write a (non-static) 
inner-class. Actually, this is exactly when one uses the various AWT 


MSN Messenger 6  : dialoguez en son et en image 
avec vos amis.

View raw message