geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeremy Boynes" <>
Subject RE: Web Clustering : Stick Sessions with Shared Store
Date Fri, 17 Oct 2003 04:41:19 GMT
> From: Bhagwat, Hrishikesh []
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 6:46 PM

> > However, as Andy says, the cost of storing a serialized object
> in a BLOB is
> > significant. Other forms of shared store are available though which may
> > offer better performance (e.g. a hi-av NFS server).
> [ HB -2 ] What about the failover of the NFS. The comment "HB-1" above
> and "Jeremy's original comment" about failover of the DB cannot
> be applied
> to NFS (not much experience with NFS .. just thinking aloude ..pls correct
> me if i am wrong on this ).

Highly available NFS solutions are available e.g. (not an
endorsement) which internally use redundant paths to avoid any single point
of failure. There are many, many other solutions available which avoid the
overhead of the database (e.g. multi-ported disk, SAN storage, shared
memory, ...)

These may not be cheap, but they do offer an alternative for central shared


View raw message