geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Strachan <james_strac...@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: JSR94
Date Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:26:26 GMT
On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 04:23  pm, Ludovic MaƮtre wrote:
> I'm pretty new to the Geronimo project but perhaps peoples want to use 
> drools from codehaus since it is developed by some of the developer of 
> geronimo, ins't it ?

Agreed - drools rocks

http://drools.codehaus.org/


> Chris Perrin wrote:
>
>> Because the JSR94 spec clearly specifies the use of J2EE as a target 
>> for
>> running a rules engine, has anyone given any thoughts for providing a 
>> rules
>> engine implementation that runs natively in Geronimo?
>>
>> Obviously something like this would be a service that the user would 
>> have to
>> configure, but it might be useful to Geronimo users to have a JSR94
>> compliant rules engine ready to go "out of the box."  If we ensured 
>> strict
>> JSR94 compliance, then we could keep people from locking into a
>> Geronimo-specific implementation if they wanted to migrate to another
>> platform.  The rules engine might also have a standalone component 
>> which
>> someone could use if they thought a Geronimo might be overkill for 
>> some
>> projects.
>>
>> If anyone thinks this is a worthwhile idea, I'll start cranking out 
>> some
>> code.

Why not just contribute to drools?

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/


Mime
View raw message