geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chris Perrin" <cpli...@hifiit.com>
Subject Re: JSR94
Date Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:27:46 GMT
James,

I agree with the statement that rules engine needs to interact with the
other components, but I was more thinking of allowing a developer access to
a drools instance for use in his/her programs.

Chris
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Strachan" <james_strachan@yahoo.co.uk>
To: <geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: JSR94


>
> On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 09:16  pm, Chris Perrin wrote:
>
> > Here's my basic thought.  It sounds like the more important thing is
> > to get
> > Drools running under JCA for Geronimo to use.  Once that has occurred,
> > it
> > should be fairly simple to expose the rules engine for deployed
> > software to
> > use.  Thoughts?
>
> Yes - though I'd say its probably the other way around. The rule engine
> monitors & controls the components all by itself. The components don't
> need to be particularly aware of the rules engine (unless certain
> components really want to). The rules engine needs to be able to see &
> control & interact with the components - not the other way around.
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>


Mime
View raw message