geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chris Perrin" <cpli...@hifiit.com>
Subject Re: JSR94
Date Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:16:20 GMT
Here's my basic thought.  It sounds like the more important thing is to get
Drools running under JCA for Geronimo to use.  Once that has occurred, it
should be fairly simple to expose the rules engine for deployed software to
use.  Thoughts?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Strachan" <james_strachan@yahoo.co.uk>
To: <geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: JSR94


> I think Jeremy was talking about how drools should be deployed into
> Geronimo, not how drools should manage components in Geronimo.
> Whichever deployment mechanism is used, drools should be able to
> monitor & manage MBeans, POJOs, JNDI etc. That would be up to the rule
> set to decide.
>
>
> On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 08:37  pm, Saad Rehmani wrote:
>
> > Jeremy,
> >
> > If I think of drools as an outside component JCA makes more sense.
> >
> > But if I think of it as something that might manage Geronimo itself,
> > the
> > MBeans approach seems to make more sense to me. I like the idea of an
> > MBeans approach since this would mean Jules' approach (drool managing
> > Geronimo) would be easier to realize. Rules rock!
> >
> > Saad Rehmani.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:jeremy@coredevelopers.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 12:37 PM
> > To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: JSR94
> >
> > I would suggest JCA rather than a pure MBean - if there is already some
> > JCA
> > support in drools it may be easier and then the solution would not be
> > Geronimo specific.
> >
> > --
> > Jeremy
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Chris Perrin [mailto:cplists@hifiit.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 8:50 AM
> >> To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: JSR94
> >>
> >>
> >> OK, I'll see what I can do about setting drools up as an MBean.
> > Nothing
> >> like sticking my head in a noose.  :)
> >>
> >> Chris
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "James Strachan" <james_strachan@yahoo.co.uk>
> >> To: <geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:43 AM
> >> Subject: Re: JSR94
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 04:32  pm, Chris Perrin wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Sorry to be obtuse, but does that mean:
> >>>>
> >>>> a) Drools already does this or
> >>>
> >>> Yes. AFAIK drools already is JSR 94 compliant and has the basics of
> > a
> >>> JCA connector implementation (which may need some work).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> b) It might be interesting to enable drools to run with Geronimo?
> >>>
> >>> Or to say that another way, we should try embedding drools into
> >>> Geronimo, either as MBeans or as a JCA connector. I can imagine
> > there's
> >>> some work required to cleanly integrate the two - if you fancy
> > diving
> >>> in and helping. Then we could start using rules to manage Geronimo
> >>> itself which would be really cool.
> >>>
> >>> James
> >>> -------
> >>> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>


Mime
View raw message