geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeremy Boynes" <jer...@coredevelopers.net>
Subject RE: [specs] J2EE specs for certification
Date Sat, 11 Oct 2003 11:25:50 GMT
IIRC, core JMX (JSR-3) suffers from the same issue as JavaMail in that
the specification includes a lot of concrete implementation. There was a
discussion on the MX4J list about trying to separate it out and produce
an interface version there but it was considered unfeasable. Geronimo is
using MX4J for its JMX implementation.

I don't know if that is also true for JSR-160 but we are currently
getting that from MX4J as well.

--
Jeremy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ralph Apel [mailto:r.apel@r-apel.de] 
> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 11:10 AM
> To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [specs] J2EE specs for certification
> 
> 
> Do we need specs-modules for all of them?
> 
> Do we need specs/jmx (for JSR-3 and JSR-160) ?
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 17:10, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> > There is a list of J2EE specs on the Wiki:
> > 
> >     http://wiki.codehaus.org/geronimo/J2EESpecs
> > 
> > but they seem to be incomplete. Can someone comment on 
> this? Is this 
> > list incomplete? I'm trying to use this as a list of work and the 
> > current status on each one.
> > 
> > Bruce
> > --
> > perl -e 'print 
> unpack("u30","<0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F9E<G)E=\$\!F<FEI+F-O;0\`\`");'
> > 
> > The Castor Project
> > http://www.castor.org/
> > 
> > Apache Geronimo
> > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/geronimo.html
> > 
> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message