Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93278 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2003 17:48:04 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 2003 17:48:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 22316 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2003 17:47:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22255 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2003 17:47:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22223 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2003 17:47:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO msexchange00.multex.com) (204.255.41.71) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 2003 17:47:44 -0000 Received: by msexchange00 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:47:21 -0400 Message-ID: <79B184B0417FD41184DB00508BA540B8058C3219@corpmail01> From: "Cabrera, Alan" To: "'geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org'" Subject: RE: Who wants to be a committer? Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:47:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Guys, is this even up for debate? This is an Apache project and I would think must follow the Apache rules. I think that some of the more senior Apache members were very clear on this. Alan > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Blewitt [mailto:Alex.Blewitt@ioshq.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 1:42 PM > To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Who wants to be a committer? > > > So, a new process; if you are interested in becoming a committer, and > have submitted enough code/contributions/become a member of the > community, simply reply to this message title. Please do not reply to > this same message title if you are not interested in becoming a > committer, or are not a committer replying. > > Once you've announced your intent, can a committer then post > a reply to > this, officially proposing a vote for that person. This will > kick-start > the normal ASF processes which I'm sure we'd all want to > follow anyway. > > To make it clearer, I suggest that message titles are as follows: > > Who wants to be a committer? <- this message > Re: Who wants to be a commiter? Alex Blewitt <- people who are > interested in nominating themselves > [Vote] Re: Who wants to be a committer? Alex Blewitt <- a committer > will have to officially launch the voting process off > Re: [Vote] Re: Who wants to be a committer? Alex Blewitt <- responses > from other people (committers have the only binding votes, > but support > from the community is also a good indication) > > Alex. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more information and to register, visit Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of The Reuters Group.