Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36504 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2003 14:23:17 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2003 14:23:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 5255 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2003 14:23:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 5190 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2003 14:23:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 5124 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2003 14:23:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO public.coredevelopers.net) (209.233.18.245) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2003 14:23:01 -0000 Received: from coredevelopers.net (dsundstrom-host236.dsl.visi.com [208.42.65.236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by public.coredevelopers.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 8.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id 91F6F1E222 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 07:15:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:23:03 -0500 Subject: Re: logging questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Dain Sundstrom To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <72961220-E91A-11D7-B8F8-000393DB559A@coredevelopers.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I think Jason sent them a patch way back for the trace level, but I don't think they applied it. I doubt that they will add my caching code in as it trades off immediate update of log levels for speed. -dain On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 06:58 AM, Alastair Rodgers wrote: > Hello Dain, > > Do you plan to merge any of this stuff (in particular, trace level) > back into the main commons logging source? Just curious. > > Al. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:dain@coredevelopers.net] >> Sent: 16 September 2003 18:52 >> To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: logging questions >> >> >> We use commons logging as the interface for logging in the >> code. Log4J >> is the default logging implementation we use, but no code should use >> Log4j directly. We do have a custom implementation of the commons >> logging interfaces using Log4j that adds real trace level logging and >> caches isXXXEnabled values. >> >> Anyway, just pretend like Log4j is not there and use commons logging. >> >> -dain >> >> On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 12:43 PM, n. alex rupp wrote: >> >>> Do we plan to use a mixture of commons logging and log4j, or is >>> someone planning to customize the logging to make it more >> fine grained >>> (a la jboss logging)? >>> >>> I noticed both commons logging and log4j are in the >> bootlib. I'm just >>> curious where our plans stand regarding them. >>> >>> Many thanks, >>> -- >>> N. Alex Rupp (n_alex_rupp@users.sf.net) >> >> /************************* * Dain Sundstrom * Partner * Core Developers Network *************************/