Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61962 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2003 23:58:56 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2003 23:58:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 33006 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2003 23:58:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 32956 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2003 23:58:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 32932 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2003 23:58:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO public.coredevelopers.net) (209.233.18.245) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2003 23:58:27 -0000 Received: from coredevelopers.net (dsundstrom-host236.dsl.visi.com [208.42.65.236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by public.coredevelopers.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 8.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id CF99D1BE1E for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 16:51:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 18:58:20 -0500 Subject: Re: Maven remote repository stable? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Dain Sundstrom To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <9BB8B466-DC7C-11D7-8B65-0003934D3EA4@ioshq.com> Message-Id: <2A13E22E-DCD8-11D7-A2AE-000393DB559A@coredevelopers.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N It would be nice if I could tell maven to only verity snapshots once a day. James does maven already do this? -dain On Monday, September 1, 2003, at 08:02 AM, Alex Blewitt wrote: > On Monday, Sep 1, 2003, at 13:55 Europe/London, gianny DAMOUR wrote: > > If we pinned some of the -DEV snapshots so that they weren't hit every > time, I get the feeling that there wouldn't be as many problems > created during building.