Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Message-ID: <20030902104654.10479.qmail@web20302.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 18:46:54 +0800 (CST)
From: =?gb2312?q?founder=5Fchen?= <founder_chen@yahoo.com.cn>
Subject: Re: Who are working on the JMS integration
To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi, 

Stefan Schuster wrote:

>Maybe we should take a look at more JMS provider
implementations than just openJMS see what they are
using as an interface to the j2ee server, so we 
>can pick an interface that is supported by as many 
>providers as possible. 

But most message broker vendors provide
vendor-specific APIs, These APIs are specific to a
message broker product and require an in-depth
knowledge
of the message broker. Such requirements add to the
complexity of building these vendor-specific adapters
and also lock us using a particular vendor.
So I think it is hard to pick an interface that is
supported by as many providers as possible.

Sincerely
founder_chen

-----Original Email-----
Sender: Stefan Schuster [mailto:zap-o-code@gmx.net] 
Time: 2003/9/2 16:03
Recipient: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Who are working on the JMS integration

Hi,

by integration options, I mean the possibilities
openJMS offers to be integrated in other products.
About the version : I think we should talk
to the openJMS folks about this. It depends
if we are willing to shoot on a moving target. If yes,
we could always work with the last version. If no,
we should pick the latest stable version and stay with
it till we have acieved something.

We should also find out which interface of
geronimo we should use for integration
(SPI,JCA, whatever). This also depends on the status
of the interfaces (i.e. if we have no JCA right now,
should
we wait for it, or use something else....) 

Maybe we should take a look at more JMS provider
implementations than just openJMS see what they are
using as an interface to the j2ee server, so we 
can pick an interface that is supported by as many 
providers as possible. 


On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 04:04, founder_chen wrote:
> Hi, Stefan
>    Thanks for response in advance. Well, I have some
> questions:
> 1. Which openjms version should we check out? (The
> lastest version is openjms0.7.6 rc1
> at http://sourceforge.net/projects/openjms)
> 
> 2. What's integration options of OpenJMS?  Such as
...
> 
> Sincerely,
> founder_chen
>   
> -----Email-----
> Sender: Stefan Schuster [mailto:zap-o-code@gmx.net] 
> Time: 2003/9/2 4:19
> Recipient: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Who are working on the JMS integration
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am also interested in working on the
> JMS integration. Lets start by evaluating the 
> integration options of OpenJMS (as mentioned on
> the geronimo project homepage. Once we are familiar
> with OpenJMS, we can think about how to integrate
> it into geronimo.
> 
> On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 16:54, founder_chen wrote:
> > Hi  
> >    I am planning to involve in the development of
> JMS 
> > integration part. Is there anybody can help me on
> the
> > status of the JMS integration part.
> > Thank you!
> > 
> > Sincerely
> > founder_chen
> > 
> > 
> > Stefan
> 
> 
-- 
Stefan


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? 
���õ����ʺţ�����Ż�ͨ[�����侳�ĵ�Ӱ]�Ķ���������������������ͷ+�Ż�ͨ��������������
http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/?http://cn.messenger.yahoo.com