Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18595 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2003 13:59:51 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2003 13:59:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 30095 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2003 13:59:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30034 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2003 13:59:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 29983 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2003 13:58:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO public.coredevelopers.net) (209.233.18.245) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2003 13:58:59 -0000 Received: from coredevelopers.net (dsundstrom-host236.dsl.visi.com [208.42.65.236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by public.coredevelopers.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 8.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id C12771953A for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 06:51:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:59:00 -0500 Subject: Re: [jsr77][core] AbstractContainer start dependancies Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Dain Sundstrom To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <16FE2CF8-E917-11D7-B8F8-000393DB559A@coredevelopers.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 05:30 PM, Greg Wilkins wrote: > Dain Sundstrom wrote: > >> I committed a change to AbstractContainer that fixes this for now, >> but this class is going away, so the change is a bit moot. > > I don't think it is going away... it is being renamed > ManagedContainer and > will be based on AbstractManagedObject. So this code will still be > there. Oh okay. Same thing to me. > Are you going to do these changes or shall I? Go for it. -dain /************************* * Dain Sundstrom * Partner * Core Developers Network *************************/