Return-Path: 
 <geronimo-dev-return-3389-apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 43046 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2003 11:42:49 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 2003 11:42:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 5919 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2003 11:42:39 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 5864 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2003 11:42:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:geronimo-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 5851 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2003 11:42:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO george.toolazydogs.com) (166.84.147.110)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 2003 11:42:38 -0000
Received: by customer.panix.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <RMAJNF8X>; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 07:53:50 -0400
Message-ID: <149246706FF1AF4996A41898AB4532531182@customer.panix.com>
From: Alan Cabrera <adc@toolazydogs.com>
To: "'geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org'"
	 <geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [XML][Deployment]POJO design?
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 07:53:48 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N


Greg, your email address is bouncing email back to me.  Anyway, the tar file
is not compressed.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Wilkins [mailto:gregw@mortbay.com] 
> 
> 
> So I think it is over to people other than Aaron and myself 
> to get some feedback.

One thing that I had always liked about the dual trees is that we have the
possibility of having many different kinds of geronimo deployment trees.
For example, we could have a geronimo tree for deployment on a massive
cluster.  We could have a geronimo tree for deployment on an IDE.

This way, the IDE information isn't littering my deployment descriptor
classes for my massive cluster deployment.


Alan