Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20530 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2003 17:46:43 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Sep 2003 17:46:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 8280 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2003 17:46:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8215 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2003 17:46:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8202 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2003 17:46:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mhub-m3.tc.umn.edu) (160.94.23.47) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Sep 2003 17:46:25 -0000 Received: from [209.181.233.149] by mhub-m3.tc.umn.edu with ESMTP for geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 12:46:28 -0500 Message-Id: <015801c37c7a$18768260$95e9b5d1@saussure> From: "n. alex rupp" To: Subject: logging questions Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 12:43:20 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Do we plan to use a mixture of commons logging and log4j, or is someone planning to customize the logging to make it more fine grained (a la jboss logging)? I noticed both commons logging and log4j are in the bootlib. I'm just curious where our plans stand regarding them. Many thanks, -- N. Alex Rupp (n_alex_rupp@users.sf.net)