Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17156 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2003 21:25:50 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2003 21:25:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 21267 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2003 21:25:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21185 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2003 21:25:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21168 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2003 21:25:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sark.cc.gatech.edu) (130.207.7.23) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2003 21:25:24 -0000 Received: from oscar.cc.gatech.edu (oscar.cc.gatech.edu [130.207.107.12]) by sark.cc.gatech.edu (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h81LOdDf029732 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 17:24:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mkurjano (r73h117.res.gatech.edu [128.61.73.117]) by oscar.cc.gatech.edu (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h81LOcQb011031 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 17:24:38 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matt Kurjanowicz" To: Subject: RE: [newbie] JMX Console - where to start? Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 17:24:32 -0400 Message-ID: <001201c370cf$6f75fb10$75493d80@mkurjano> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N As far as which angle (command line, web, etc.), I'm interested in any of those. Is Twiddle what you are talking about on the command line? Expanding the Tomcat code sounds like a really interesting idea, but I'm not familiar with the code behind it. I am not completely familiar with JMX and JSR -77 and -88, but I am definitely willing to learn. To be completely honest, I'm really new at J2EE stuff, but have lots of time and willingness to learn, so I've been playing around with different J2EE components, but nothing spectacular so far. Thanks for your help, Matt Kurjanowicz -----Original Message----- From: Aaron Mulder [mailto:ammulder@alumni.princeton.edu] Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 4:30 PM To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [newbie] JMX Console - where to start? There is a bit of code in place already for a command-line interface, which could be used to implement command-line JMX management for Geronimo (indeed, there's already a sample command that starts the server). If you'd like pursue the command-line angle, I can give you some more detail. I believe there was talk of extending the Tomcat 5 web UI for JMX management for Geronimo, if you're interested in the web angle. There is also some OpenEJB code that could be drawn on here. I know little about either, but there are others on the list who could certainly tell you more. If you're thinking of a Swing sort of management console, I don't think anything concrete has even been proposed. In any case, are you familiar with JMX, JSR-77, and JSR-88 already? Aaron P.S. No design specs as such, though there are occasional formulated ideas in the mail archive and/or the Wiki. This is not to say a more organized approach to design would be turned down. On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Matt Kurjanowicz wrote: > Hi there, > I'm really interested in getting involved, and have been reading the > mailing list and looking thru the code for a little while, and now I'm > itching to get my hands dirty. > I'd really like to get involved in the JMX management console. Where is > a good place to start? Has there been any code written for it yet? How > about any design specs? If so, where can I find these? And if not, does > anyone have any ideas in there head of what it should encompass that > they're willing to throw out there? > > Thanks, > Matt Kurjanowicz > >