> Stefan Schuster wrote:
>
> >Maybe we should take a look at more JMS provider
> implementations than just openJMS see what they are
> using as an interface to the j2ee server, so we
> >can pick an interface that is supported by as many
> >providers as possible.
>
> But most message broker vendors provide
> vendor-specific APIs, These APIs are specific to a
> message broker product and require an in-depth
> knowledge
> of the message broker. Such requirements add to the
> complexity of building these vendor-specific adapters
> and also lock us using a particular vendor.
> So I think it is hard to pick an interface that is
> supported by as many providers as possible.

If the message broker is JMS compliant it implements the JMS API's. Or am
I mixing up the JMS API's with API's for integration ?

reg,
Thies