geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thies Edeling <th...@rrm.net>
Subject Re: Who are working on the JMS integration
Date Tue, 02 Sep 2003 09:55:03 GMT

I had exactly the same problem although I didn't have time to try to fix
it.

About openJMS being a black-box, does it provide all the functionality we
need? If it doesn't seeing it as a black-box won't work since we'll need
to add functionality, right?

On 2 Sep 2003, Stefan Schuster wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I tried to build OpenJMS 10 minutes ago, but
> it failed with missing dependencies in the
> maven repository at ibiblio. I guess you are
> right, and we should consider openJMS a black-box
> system.
>
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 11:23, Daniel S. Haischt wrote:
> > founder_chen wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Stefan
> > >    Thanks for response in advance. Well, I have some
> > > questions:
> > > 1. Which openjms version should we check out? (The
> > > lastest version is openjms0.7.6 rc1
> > > at http://sourceforge.net/projects/openjms)
> >
> > wouldn't it be the best solution to just use a OpenJMS
> > release instead of using the CVS sources. if possible
> > the OpenJMS system should be considered as a black
> > box system which means that you don't know most of
> > the internals.
> >
> > >
> > > 2. What's integration options of OpenJMS?  Such as ...
> > >
> >
> > how about a Java Connector API v1.5 compliant resource
> > adapter?
> >
> > regards
> >
> > daniel s. haischt
> > --
> >
> >
> --
> Stefan
>
>


Mime
View raw message