geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@coredevelopers.net>
Subject Re: [vote] Process for adding committers
Date Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:30:55 GMT
We need to make you a commiter NOW!

=)

--jason


On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 12:38  AM, n. alex rupp wrote:

> If speed is the concern, how is a week-long process (option #1) better 
> than
> the traditional process (option #2)?
>
> In option number two any of the committers can suggest someone, bring 
> up a
> vote and conclude the matter by day's end.  There is no week-long 
> waiting
> period and there is no need to coordinate efforts with an ASF sponsor. 
>  It
> just happens, as quickly as the developers see fit.  (PMC intervention
> notwithstanding)
>
> ( the non-committer places his imaginary ballot)
> -0 for option #1
> +1 for option #2
>
> --
> N. Alex Rupp (n_alex_rupp@users.sf.net)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alex Blewitt" <Alex.Blewitt@ioshq.com>
> To: <geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 12:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [vote] Process for adding committers
>
>
>> Surely the basic ideas are the same, though? They are following ASF
>> procedures; the only difference proposed by Davanum is that to
>> kick-start the process off, rather than waiting for the committers to
>> propose people, a number of people step forward in that week and then
>> block voting occurs. The only difference is kick-starting the list of
>> proposed committers.
>>
>> Alex.
>>
>> On Wednesday, Sep 10, 2003, at 18:21 Europe/London, Jeremy Boynes 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> With two options on the table, I think we need to put this to bed
>>> quickly so
>>> I am calling for a vote between the two following options:
>>>
>>> Option #1 from Davanum Srinivas:
>>>    Step #1: 1 week of Nominations.
>>>             Existing committers can nominate new committers by
>>>             sending a note to the dev mailing list.
>>>    Step #2: One of the ASF sponsors consolidates the list of
>>>             nominations and starts a VOTE on the dev
>>>             mailing list. VOTE is open for 1 week.
>>>             Existing committers can use +1/+0/-0/-1 to indicate
>>>             their preference in an email to the dev mailing list.
>>>    Step #3: ASF sponsor conveys the result of the VOTE to the
>>>             incubator PMC and asks for permission to add the new
>>>             committers.
>>>
>>> Option #2 from Ryan Ackley:
>>>    Step #1: Any committer can propose someone as a committer at
>>>             any time. The proposing committer generally lists
>>>             their contributions and why they should be made a
>>>             committer.
>>>    Step #2: Any current committer can vote on the new committer.
>>>             The vote is open for 3 days and requires consensus
>>>             ( three +1's and no -1's) as per
>>>             http://incubator.apache.org/drafts/voting.html
>>>             (note this is a different link than Ryan's original)
>>>    Step #3: A positive result is handled as per
>>>             http://incubator.apache.org/drafts/newcommitters.html
>>>
>>> We go with whichever option gets the highest score after three days
>>> (+1's
>>> less -1's) unless the outcome is obvious.
>>>
>>> My vote:
>>> Option #1:
>>>     -0 jboynes - I think we should use a standard process from the
>>>                  beginning for all committers rather than a custom 
>>> one
>>>
>>> Option #2:
>>>     +1 jboynes - It's the normal process
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


Mime
View raw message