geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alastair Rodgers" <alastair.rodg...@phocis.com>
Subject RE: logging questions
Date Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:58:09 GMT
Hello Dain, 

Do you plan to merge any of this stuff (in particular, trace level) back into the main commons
logging source? Just curious.

Al.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:dain@coredevelopers.net] 
> Sent: 16 September 2003 18:52
> To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: logging questions
> 
> 
> We use commons logging as the interface for logging in the 
> code.  Log4J 
> is the default logging implementation we use, but no code should use 
> Log4j directly.  We do have a custom implementation of the commons 
> logging interfaces using Log4j that adds real trace level logging and 
> caches isXXXEnabled values.
> 
> Anyway, just pretend like Log4j is not there and use commons logging.
> 
> -dain
> 
> On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 12:43 PM, n. alex rupp wrote:
> 
> > Do we plan to use a mixture of commons logging and log4j, or is 
> > someone planning to customize the logging to make it more 
> fine grained 
> > (a la jboss logging)?
> >
> > I noticed both commons logging and log4j are in the 
> bootlib.  I'm just 
> > curious where our plans stand regarding them.
> >
> > Many thanks,
> > --
> > N. Alex  Rupp (n_alex_rupp@users.sf.net)
> 

Mime
View raw message