geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@coredevelopers.net>
Subject Re: [vote] Aaron Mulder as committer
Date Fri, 12 Sep 2003 02:04:45 GMT
Agreed, but we have been asked again and again to add committers, so we 
are trying to figure out who to add.

--jason


On Friday, September 12, 2003, at 08:41  AM, Nick Faiz wrote:

> I'd agree with that.
>
> The votes are very friendly at the moment but I can imagine 
> controversial
> scenarios.
>
> I don't know the Apache process for handling this sort of thing; a 
> quiet
> vote among the current committers and project heads might be 
> worthwhile. We
> could simply see the results emailed out or an email could be sent to 
> each
> coder whom was voted in.
>
> Cheers,
> Nick Faiz.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:aaron@clove.org]
> Sent: Friday, 12 September 2003 11:34 AM
> To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [vote] Aaron Mulder as committer
>
> I don't think it's a good idea to hold public votes on things like 
> this.
>
> Normally, the PMC conducts these votes on the project pmc mailing list,
> but since this project isn't yet out of incubation, that responsibility
> falls to the incubator pmc. If you believe someone should gain commit
> access to this project, feel free to bring it up to someone on the PMC
> (or write to pmc@incubator.apache.org).
>
> -aaron
>
>
> On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 10:48  AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
>> Aaron has been involved in Geronimo since its launch and has submitted
>> numerous patches. He has shown initiative in taking on areas that were
>> not
>> being developed and that were likely to be needed imminently; for
>> example,
>> implementation of JSR88 functionality, a command line deployer and EJB
>> verifier. He has actively participated in design discussions and has
>> shown
>> an ability to work with other Contributors.
>>
>> I would like to nominate Aaron Mulder as a Committer and here's my +1.
>>
>> [ ] +1 - I agree.
>> [ ] +0 - I agree, but think we should wait until ...
>> [ ] -0 - I disagree, but not enough to stop the train.
>> [ ] -1 - I disagree and my reason(s) are/is ......
>>
>> --
>> Jeremy
>


Mime
View raw message