geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@coredevelopers.net>
Subject Re: logging questions
Date Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:23:03 GMT
I think Jason sent them a patch way back for the trace level, but I 
don't think they applied it.  I doubt that they will add my caching 
code in as it trades off immediate update of log levels for speed.

-dain

On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 06:58 AM, Alastair Rodgers wrote:

> Hello Dain,
>
> Do you plan to merge any of this stuff (in particular, trace level) 
> back into the main commons logging source? Just curious.
>
> Al.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:dain@coredevelopers.net]
>> Sent: 16 September 2003 18:52
>> To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: logging questions
>>
>>
>> We use commons logging as the interface for logging in the
>> code.  Log4J
>> is the default logging implementation we use, but no code should use
>> Log4j directly.  We do have a custom implementation of the commons
>> logging interfaces using Log4j that adds real trace level logging and
>> caches isXXXEnabled values.
>>
>> Anyway, just pretend like Log4j is not there and use commons logging.
>>
>> -dain
>>
>> On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 12:43 PM, n. alex rupp wrote:
>>
>>> Do we plan to use a mixture of commons logging and log4j, or is
>>> someone planning to customize the logging to make it more
>> fine grained
>>> (a la jboss logging)?
>>>
>>> I noticed both commons logging and log4j are in the
>> bootlib.  I'm just
>>> curious where our plans stand regarding them.
>>>
>>> Many thanks,
>>> --
>>> N. Alex  Rupp (n_alex_rupp@users.sf.net)
>>
>>

/*************************
  * Dain Sundstrom
  * Partner
  * Core Developers Network
  *************************/


Mime
View raw message