geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Wilkins <gr...@mortbay.com>
Subject Re: [vote]POJO design?
Date Sun, 14 Sep 2003 08:04:31 GMT



Aaron Mulder wrote:
> Greg,
> 
> 	I know I was going to try to do it yesterday, but I still haven't
> had a chance to look at your latest patch, and I won't be able to do so
> today either.  So let me declare my intention to vote tomorrow, and please
> don't draw any conclusions before then.  Sorry for the delay!

Nah - I think we should restrict the vote to sad gits that work on
open source all weekend :-)

I'll probably put a new patch up tonight with a few more minor
cleanups - but no changes of substance.

cheers


> Aaron
> 
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> 
>>We have 2 concrete patches and 1 abstract proposal to vote on:
>>
>>[  ] Greg's patch: A single tree of standard & geronimo elements
>>[  ] Aaron's/Jeremy's patch: Dual concrete trees
>>[  ] Proposal of a concrete geronimo tree with abstract standard tree.
>>
>>
>>My own vote is
>>
>>[+1] Greg's patch: A single tree of standard & geronimo elements
>>[-0] Aaron's/Jeremy's patch: Dual concrete trees
>>[+0] Proposal of a concrete geronimo tree with abstract standard tree.
> 
> 
> 




Mime
View raw message