geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Wilkins <gr...@mortbay.com>
Subject Re: [vote] Process for adding committers
Date Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:46:13 GMT



Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> No-one objected and no-one new voted overnight so I'm going to declare we
> decided on Option #2.

I've been offline for 24hrs for an ISP reasons - so it would be good to keep
votes like this open for at least a few days.

Not that it matters for me on this one:

  +1 for Option #2

cheers

> I'll post this result in the STATUS file and on the wiki - is there anywhere
> else it needs to get recorded?
> 
> --
> Jeremy
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:jeremy=RZBK1LssX03d44zGQf8aCqxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org]
>>Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:28 PM
>>To: geronimo-dev=d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org
>>Subject: RE: [vote] Process for adding committers
>>
>>
>>On another thread, RMH said "I'm assuming that we are done voting on how
>>committers are added"
>>
>>After 12 hours, the tally is (binding votes only)
>>Option #1: -0 jboynes
>>           +0 jdillon
>>
>>Option #2: +1 jboynes, bsnyder, jdillon, dain, richardmf
>>
>>Distibution of non-binding votes is similar. The trend seems obvious so
>>unless anyone objects I am proposing we close this at 10AM PST 9/11.
>>
>>--
>>Jeremy
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 




Mime
View raw message