geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeremy Boynes" <>
Subject RE: committers (again)
Date Wed, 10 Sep 2003 04:49:14 GMT
> From: Greg Stein [] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:22 AM
> To:
> Subject: committers (again)
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 03:58:38AM -0000, 
> wrote:
> >...
> > From: Dain Sundstrom <>
> > Subject: State of the Project
> > To:
> > Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 16:11:25 -0500
> >...
> > Another challenge facing us is how to grow the committer 
> base.  There
> > is some perception of a cathedral clique of insiders, whereas in 
> Yup. One of the reasons that I suggested adding committers 
> ASAP. The more you wait, the more you reinforce this. You've 
> got a lot of people banging on the door, more than willing to 
> help. Open it, already. And do it on your own terms rather 
> than having the PMC do it.

The door is open, but everyone is milling around in confusion. Let's fix

> > reality, many of the project management issues have arisen 
> because the
> > current committers are not used to working together and are 
> new to the 
> > Apache Way.  With the initial startup phase behind us, we will be 
> > looking to expand the project rapidly over the next couple 
> of months.
> There are few true barriers to adding committers. The notion 
> of "current committers are not used to working together" is a 
> red herring. You're already working with the community at 
> large. It has nothing to do with the current set of committers.

I don't think it's a red herring, I think it is a major part of the
confusion. None of the folks new to Apache really know how it is
supposed to work and, as I understand it, are tasked with the
responsibility of deciding. IIRC only one person, ever, at ASF has had
commit revoked, which should make granting it a decision not to be taken

> I would recommend coming up with, say, a list of four people 
> and submit that list to pmc@incubator for consideration. How 
> about by end of week?

Do we do this in public, or private? 

This is not a cathedral question, but an attempt to handle the case
where someone gets proposed, someone -1's the proposal and has to
justify it - how do we avoid embarrassing or humiliating a contributor?

> If you don't want to do this, then let's hear a discussion 
> about why. My previous emails on this subject have gone 
> unanswered. :-(

We do want to do it (at least I do) - and we could use some guidance
from the PMC.


View raw message